HALITOSIS WITH FIXED ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE VS REMOVABLE ORTHODONTIC ALIGNERS: A PILOT STUDY
Introduction: Halitosis is a widespread condition and is a big handicap for the patients. Most adults suffer from bad breath, an estimated 10-30 percent of the USA population, and this may lead to personal discomfort and social disagreement. Furthermore, some authors estimate that approximately 50% of the middle-aged and older individuals emit socially unacceptable breath, especially in the morning, which can be attributed to physiological causes. Methodology: For the purposes of this study 10 patients with aligners (aligners grup – AG) and 10 patients with fixed orthodontic appliance (fixed group – FG) were selected. This experiment aims to detect the presence of halitosis with a gaschromatograph (OralChroma™). The machine analyzes the air sample and provides results in 8 minutes by creating a graphic that shows the amount of 3 volatile sulfur compounds. Results: The values measured by the gascromatograph show a significant difference between the two groups. We also considered the average values of both groups. The averages confirm the difference between AG and FG group (FG average > AG average) in all three values. Conclusion: This study is only a pilot study and should be expanded in order to produce more consistent results, but we can already assert that the possibility to remove the oral device certainly provides a better outcome for oral hygiene procedures and, consequently, improves the halitosis condition. In conclusion we can consider oral hygiene and halitosis as important factors in order to decide what kind of orthodontic device is better suited for the single patient. Keywords: halitosis, orthodontic appliance, clear aligners, volatile sulfur compounds (VSC), gaschromatograph. ABSTRACT Received: March 22, 2016 Accepted: April 22, 2016 Available online: May 05, 2016 Cite this article: Levrini L, Posimo D, Tieghi G, Gualandi G, Caprioglio A. Halitosis with fixed orthodontic appliance vs removable orthodontic aligners: a pilot study. Stoma Edu J. 2016; 3(1):150-155. Luca Levrini1a*, Domenico Posimo2b, Giulia Tieghi2c, Giulio Gualandi1d, Alberto Caprioglio1e ¹Department of Surgical and Morphological Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy ²School of Dentistry, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy a DDS, PhD, Associate Professor; President, Dental Hygiene School; Director, Research Centre Cranio Facial Disease and Medicine, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy; Assistant Medical Director, Dental Clinic, Fondazione Macchi Hospital, Varese, Italy b dental student c Dental Hygienist, dental student d DDS, Post Graduate Program in Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics e DDS, PhD, Associate Professor, Chief Program in Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics *Corresponding author: Associate Professor Luca Levrini, DDS, PhD, President, Dental Hygiene School Director, Research Centre Cranio Facial Disease and Medicine University of Insubria Via Giuseppe Piatti, 10 I-21100 Varese VA, Italy Tel/Fax: 0332.825.663, e-mail: email@example.com 1. Introduction Halitosis is a widespread condition and is a big handicap for the patients. Most adults suffer from bad breath, an estimated 10-30 percent of the USA population, and this may lead to personal discomfort and social disagreement1. Furthermore, some authors estimate that approximately 50% of the middle-aged and older individuals emit socially unacceptable breath, especially in the morning; this can be attributed to physiological causes2. Halitosis, which means foul breath, might be related to physiologic and/or pathologic reasons3 such as ear nose-throat diseases (chronic sinusitis, tonsillitis), gastrointestinal system diseases, diabetes mellitus, and acute rheumatic fever. Also, more frequently, halitosis can be related to intraoral factors, including especially gram-negative anaerobic microorganisms on the dental plaque, in the periodontal pockets, in the saliva, and on the dorsum of the tongue4. Besides these causes we should consider orthodontic treatment too. With the presence of fixed orthodontic appliances, efficiency when performing dental hygiene procedures decreased 151 in a stastically significant way (p=0,003), which led to a statistically significant increase of the plaque and tongue coating indexes, and confirmed the suspected positive correlation between halitosis and fixed orthodontic appliances5. The brackets and ligatures have a negative effect on natural cleaning by creating retention areas for plaque, making the mechanical cleaning of the teeth and gingiva by the tongue and lips more difficult, and increasing the viscosity of the saliva6-8. It has been stated that the accumulation of plaque and the increase in bacterial count9 and tongue coating10 are clearly also involved in the formation of halitosis. There are also plenty of studies about the effect of orthodontic treatment on the periodontium11,12. Determining the bracket system that causes the less destructive biologic effect has gained importance today. In this perspective, studies have been conducted on self-ligating brackets (SLB), with conflicting opinions. The absence of ligatures should provide fewer retentive sites than other bracket ligation types13 but, on the other hand, this theoretical advantage may be eliminated in reality because SLB consist in opening and closing mechanisms that may provide additional plaque retention sites14,15. Instead, with aligner devices, oral hygiene habits were very good16. The use of removable orthodontic appliances, particularly invisible aligners, allows adequate oral hygiene and can reduce the risk of dental and periodontal complications such as white spot lesions, caries and periodontitis17. About the correlation between halitosis and orthodontic aligner treatment, it has been shown that this kind of treatment (Invisalign®) is characterized by only minimal impairment of overall oral health and the associated quality of life. Neither halitosis, nor oral dryness, nor high plaque or gingival index measurements were observed4. This is a very interesting study but it does not compare orthodontic aligners and fixed orthodontic appliances, as predisposing conditions to halitosis. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the presence of volatile sulfur compounds (VSCs) in patients with orthodontic aligner compared to patients with orthodontic fixed appliance. The VSC consisting of hydrogen sulfide, dimethyl sulfide, and especially methyl mercaptan released through the proteolytic degradation of saliva, exfoliated epithelium, food debris, gingival crevicolar fluid, plaque, postnasal drip, sulfur-containing amino acids, and peptides in the blood by the anaerobic microorganisms found in the oral cavity are effective on the formation of halitosis18. The null hypothesis is that there are no differences in oral volatile sulfur compounds (VSC) emissions between patients with fixed orthodontic appliances and orthodontic aligners. 2. Materials and Methods 2.1. Study Sample Fixed Orthodontic and Invisalign® patients were selected consecutively with the following characteristics: age between 18 and 39 years old, good general health, non-smokers, absence of systemic diseases, absence of gastro esophageal reflux, no eating disorders (DAC) and not pregnant. The fixed orthodontic treatment we intended was a superior and inferior multi-brackets system at least from first molar to first molar, instead, the Invisalign treatment consisted of superior and inferior aligner devices. Both treatments have to be started since, at least, three months subjects were involved in the study. We considered the following characteristics as exclusion criteria: individuals with systemic diseases, medical treatments, cuts, sores, lesions of the mucosa and wounds, bearers of crowns, veneers or bridges on the upper incisors and active carious lesions. We also left out individuals who declared to not brush their teeth at least three times a day, to not use dental floss and/or dental picks and, in Invisalign® cases, to not clean aligners with their personal toothbrush and toothpaste (with RDA less than 100) at least two times a week and to not put them in immersion solution of sodium sulfate carbonate at least once a week19,20. Among these patients10 patients with aligners (aligners group – AG) and – 10 patients with fixed orthodontic appliance (fixed group – FG) were selected. The study was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and in compliance with Good Clinical Practice. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the University of Insubria Research Centre Cranio Facial Disease and Medicine Institutional Ethical Committee. Before taking part in the study each patient was required to sign an informed consent form to which a detailed description of the study protocol was attached. These individuals were asked to come for the orthodontic control, at least an hour after performing the oral hygiene procedures, and for VSC measurements. 2.2. Methodology This experiment aims to detect the presence of halitosis with a gaschromatograph OralChroma™ (Fig. 1). The patient must keep a sterile disposable 1 ml syringe in the oral cavity for 60 seconds, with his mouth closed and without contaminating it with saliva (Fig. 2 a-c). After 60 seconds, the patient must open and close the syringe plunger 2 times, Figure 1. Gaschromatograph OralChroma™ HALITOSIS WITH FIXED ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE VS REMOVABLE ORTHODONTIC ALIGNERS: A PILOT STUDY 152 STOMA.EDUJ (2016) 3 (2) without letting saliva inside (Fig. 3). After this operation, the clinician takes the syringe with the plunger open, empties it up to 0.5 ml, mounts the needle (supplied with the OralChroma™) and quickly inserts it into the machine’s slot and pushes the piston of the syringe to put the air into the machine that starts analyzing the sample of breath. The volatile sulfur compounds that are analyzed to identify the presence or absence of halitosis are: hydrogen sulphide H2S, methyl mercaptan CH3SH and dimethylsulfide (CH3)2S (Fig. 4). The machine analyzes the air sample and provides results in 8 minutes by creating a graphic that shows the amount of 3 volatile sulfur compounds. The results are reported in ppb or ng / 10ml. The unit chosen to present the results of this study is the ppb. To make a diagnosis of halitosis it is sufficient to have one of the three volatile sulfur compounds at a level higher than the threshold, that is different for each of the three gases. In particular: 112 ppb/10 ml H2S Hydrogen sulfide, 26 ppb/10 ml CH3SH methyl mercaptan and 8 ppb (CH3) 2S dimethylsulfide. 2.3. Data Evaluation The data obtained were collected in Excel sheets and analyzed by an analysis software. A statistical test for independent samples, Mann-Whitney test, and a statistical significance test used in the analysis of contingency tables, Fisher’s exact test, was used to compare the two groups, a value difference of p <0.05 was considered statistically significant. The graphic system choosen to show the data is a box plot. Figure 2 a-c. The patient must keep a sterile disposable 1 ml syringe in the oral cavity for 60 seconds 2b. 2a. 2c. Figure 3. After 60 seconds, the patient must open and close the syringe plunger 2 times, without letting saliva inside HALITOSIS WITH FIXED ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE VS REMOVABLE ORTHODONTIC ALIGNERS: A PILOT STUDY 153 3. Results The values measured by the gascromatograph show a significant difference between the two groups. The minimum value for each gas in both groups is 0, while the maximum values are: – AG group: 76 (H2S), 17 (CH3SH) and 3 ((CH3)2S). They are all under the threshold. – FG group: 491 (H2S), 45 (CH3SH) and 44 ((CH3)2S). In this case all the values are over the threshold. We also considered the mean of both groups. Means confirm the difference between AG and FG group (FG mean > AG mean) in all three values (Tab. 1). The standard deviation study shows that AG values are nearer to average than FG values (Tab. 2). Figure 4. Example of chart showing the levels of the three VSC AG FG H2 S CH3 SH (CH3 ) 2 S H2 S CH3 SH (CH3 ) 2 S 11,2 1,7 0,3 123,7 7 7,7 Table 1. Mean for each gas AG FG H2 S CH3 SH (CH3 ) 2 S H2 S CH3 SH (CH3 ) 2 S 24,0 5,4 0,9 179,2 14,5 14,2 Table 2. Standard deviation for each gas 4. Discussion This study evaluates the presence of volatile sulfur compounds (VSCs) in patients with orthodontic aligners compared to patients with orthodontic fixed appliances. In the aligner group, the three gases evaluated by OralChroma were below the threshold in the 10 patients participating in this study. Instead, in the fixed orthodontics appliance group, there were considerable differences between the patients. Five subjects in this group were over the threshold for at least one gas value and this is sufficient to consider these individuals as halitosis carriers, but two of this group were over the threshold for two gas values. The other five subjects, instead, were under the threshold for all of the three gas values measured in this study. The literature is poor on studies that compare the presence of halitosis between two types of orthodontic appliances, but they treat separately the halitosis problem and the two appliances considered in this study. The Rosenberg’s study2 shows that approximately 50% of the middle-aged and older individuals emit socially unacceptable breath. Zurfluh et al., instead, studied halitosis in the presence of fixed orthodontic appliances and in this case the percentage increases. One of the causes must be sought in the decrease of dental hygiene performance that leads to an increase of the plaque and tongue coating indexes. LaraCarillo et al. demonstrated that brackets and ligatures have a negative effect on natural cleaning because they create retention areas for plaque and increase the viscosity of the saliva. For the same reason they make the mechanical cleaning of the teeth and the gingiva, performed by tongue and lips, also more difficult. Furthermore, for Pellegrini et al. an increase of plaque index causes an increase in the bacterial count, which clearly is involved in the formation of halitosis9. Starting from these considerations, many studies have been conducted by several authors6,7,13 about selfligating brackets (SLB), because the absence of ligatures was supposed to provide fewer retention areas than in other bracket ligation types, but the opening/closing mechanisms may provide, on the contrary, additional plaque retention HALITOSIS WITH FIXED ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE VS REMOVABLE ORTHODONTIC ALIGNERS: A PILOT STUDY 154 STOMA.EDUJ (2016) 3 (2) HALITOSIS WITH FIXED ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE VS REMOVABLE ORTHODONTIC ALIGNERS: A PILOT STUDY areas11,14. Alternatively, Schaefer et al. showed that removable orthodontic appliances, particularly invisible aligners, allow a more adequate oral hygiene16. About the correlation between halitosis and orthodontic aligners treatment it is shown that this kind of treatment did not lead to an increase of plaque and bacterial count, thus neither halitosis, nor oral dryness, nor high plaque or gingival index measurements were observed. 5. Conclusion The study shows similar results in both groups, but the aligners group shows better results because none of the subjects have high level of volatile sulfur compounds or, better yet, they are all below the threshold for the three values considered. In the second group, instead, there are some differences among the patients because of their different level of oral hygiene, which can cause important changes in the VSC analysis. The presence of brackets, ligatures and archwires is a big increasing factor for halitosis. Indeed, they cannot be removed by the subject during oral hygiene procedures therefore plaque retention is surely higher than in the aligners group, where the appliance can be removed and oral hygiene can be performed as any subject without orthodontic appliances would do17. This study is only a pilot study and should be expanded in order to produce more consistent results, but we can already assert that the possibility to remove the oral device certainly provides a better outcome for oral hygiene procedures and, consequently, improves the halitosis condition. In conclusion we can consider oral hygiene and halitosis as important factors in order to decide what kind of orthodontic device is better suited for the single patient. Acknowledgments The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this study. There are no conflicts of interest and no financial interests to be disclosed. REFERENCES 1. Tangerman A. Halitosis in medicine: a review. Int Dent J. 2002;52 Suppl 3:201-206. 2. Rosenberg M. Bad breath: research perspectives. Ramat Aviv: Ramot Publishing, Tel Aviv University; 1997. 3. Newman MG, van Winkelhof AJ. Antibiotic and Antimicrobial Use in Dental Practice. 2nd ed. London, UK: Quintessence; 2000. 4. Nalçaci R, Sönmez IS. Evaluation of oral malodor in children. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;106(3):384-388. 5. Zurfluh MA, van Waes HJ, Filippi A. The influence of fixed orthodontic appliances on halitosis. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahmed. 2013;123(12):1064-1075. 6. Lara-Carillo E, Montiel-Bastida NM, Sànchez Pèrez L, AlanìsTavira J. Effect of orthodontic treatment on saliva, plaque and the levels of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2010;15(6):e924-929. 7. Pellegrini P, Sauerwein R, Finlayson T, McLeod J, Covell DA Jr, Maier T, Machida CA. Plaque retention by self-ligating vs elastomeric orthodontic brackets: quantitative comparison of oral bacteria and detection with adenosine triphosphate-driven bioluminescence. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;135(4):426. e1-e9; discussion 426-427. 8. Scheie AA, Arneberg P, Krosgstad O. Effect of orthodontic treatment on prevalance of Streptococcus Mutans in plaque and saliva. Scand J Dent Res. 1984;92(3):211-217. 9. Tonzetich J. Production and origin of oral malodor: a review of mechanisms and methods of analysis. J Periodontol. 1977;48(1):13-20. 10. De Boever EH, Loesche WJ. Assessing the contribution of anaerobic microflora of the tongue to oral malodor. J Am Dent Assoc. 1995;126(10):1384-1393. 11. Pandis N, Vlachopoulos K, Polychronopoulou A, Madianos P, Eliades T. Periodontal condition of the mandibolar anterior dentition in patients with conventional and self ligating brackets. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2008;11(4):211-215. 12. Babacan H, Sokucu O, Marakoglu I, Ozdemir H, Nalcaci R. Effects of fixed appliances on oral malador. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Ortop. 2011;139(3):351-355. 13. Ogaard B, Rolla G, Arends J Orthodontic appliances and enamel demineralization. Part 1. Lesion development. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988;94(1):68-73. 14. Kaygisiz E, Uzuner FD, Yuksel S, Taner L, Culhaoğlu R, Sezgin Y, Ateş C. Effects of self-ligating and conventional brackets on halitosis and periodontal conditions. Angle Orthod. 2015;85(3):468-473. 15. Nalçacı R, Özat Y, Çokakoğlu S, Türkkahraman H, Önal S, Kaya S. Effect of bracket type on halitosis, periodontal status, and microbial colonization. Angle Orthod. 2014;84(3):479-485. 16. Schaefer I, Braumann B. Halitosis, oral health and quality of life during treatment with Invisalign® and the effect of a lowdose chlorhexidine solution. J Orofac Orthop. 2010;71(6):430- 441. 17. Levrini L, Novara F, Margherini S, Tenconi C, Raspanti M. Scanning electron microscopy analysis of the growth of dental plaque on the surfaces of removable orthodontic aligners after the use of different cleaning methods. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2015;7:125-231. 18. Quirynen M, Zhao H, van Steenberghe D. Review of the treatment strategies for oral malodour. Clin Oral Investig. 2002;6(1):1-10. 19. Levrini L, Abbate GM, Migliori F, Orrù G, Sauro S, Caprioglio A. Assessment of the periodontal health status in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed or removable appliances. A microbiological and preliminary clinical study. Cumhuriyet Dent J. 2013;16(4):296-307. 20. Abbate GM, Caria MP, Montanari P, Mannu C, Orrù G, Caprioglio A, Levrini L. Periodontal health in teenagers treated with removable aligners and fixed orthodontic appliances. J Orofac Orthop. 2015;76(3):240-250. 155 HALITOSIS WITH FIXED ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE VS REMOVABLE ORTHODONTIC ALIGNERS: A PILOT STUDY Professor Luca Levrini is President of the Dental Hygiene School and Director of the University Research Centre on “Cranio Facial Disease and Medicine”, at the University of Insubria, Department of Surgical and Morfological Sciences in Italy. Assistant Medical Director of the Dental Department at Fondazione Macchi Hospital (Varese, Italy). Free lance journalist. Member of the Medical Council in Como, Italy. Author of more than 180 scientific papers dealing with oral prevention and orthodontics, and free-lance member of some dental and medical journals. Active member of Società Italiana di Ortodonzia and Certificate speaker for Align Technology. Luca LEVRINI DDS, PhD, Associate Professor President, Dental Hygiene School Director, Research Centre Cranio Facial Disease and Medicine University of Insubria, Varese, Italy Assistant Medical Director, Dental Clinic Fondazione Macchi Hospital, Varese, Italy CV Questions Which are the VSC? qa. VSC (volatile sulfur compounds) are hydrogen sulphide H2S, methyl mercaptan CH3SH and dimethylsulfide (CH3)2S; qb. VSC are sulfur dioxide SO2, methyl mercaptan CH3SH and dimethylsulfide (CH3)2S; qc. VSC are hydrogen sulphide H2S, dimethyl mercaptan (CH3)2SH and dimethylsulfide (CH3)2S; qd. VSC are hydrogen sulphide H2S, methyl mercaptan CH3SH and methylsulfide CH3S. Which kind of instrument was used to measure the VSC? qa. A gascromatograph was used to measure the VSC; qb. A halimeter was used to measure the VSC; qc. A spectrophotometer was used to measure the VSC; qd. Salivar strips were used to measure the VSC. Are VSC levels higher in the orthodontic fixed group (FG) or in the aligner group (AG)? qa. The FG shows higher level of VSC; qb. The AG shows higher level of VSC; qc. FG and AG show the same VSC level; qd. The FG shows lower level of VSC. How can the measurement of halitosis be useful in orthodontic treatment? qa. The measurement of halitosis cannot be used for making an appropriate orthodontic treatment choice; qb. Halitosis is an important factor in order to decide what kind of orthodontic device is better suited for a single patient; qc. The measurement of halitosis is useful to improve the oral hygiene of the patient; qd. Halitosis does not appear during orthodontic treatment.